|
|
RESEARCH BRIEFS
Remembering Judah Folkman, Visionary Scientist and Mentor
Robert Langer gives more than a hundred talks each year. He begins each
in much the same way, by acknowledging his debt to his mentor, the late Judah
Folkman. After one lecture, he was approached by an elderly man who said
he had once met Folkman’s father, a rabbi, and his 9-year-old son. “He
told me 9-year-old Judah Folkman was the smartest person he’d ever
met,” said Langer.

Kristin Johnson
“We are Judah’s legacy. He was the central hub from which arms
reach around the globe,” said Donald Ingber (above), speaking about
Judah Folkman. Ingber is pictured with Marsha Moses.
Legends of famous people often recount how the seeds of greatness were
sown early in life. Langer told his own version during a day-and-a-half scientific
symposium, “A Celebration of the Life and Work of Judah Folkman.” Organized
by Marsha Moses and Donald Ingber, the event—held on Dec. 5 and 6 and
preceded by a morning of reminiscences by Folkman’s colleagues and
wife, Paula—drew hundreds of scientists from around the world, most
of them Folkman’s former students, postdocs, colleagues, and patients.
It could have been an opportunity for exuberant mythmaking about an indisputably
great scientist, so towering and revered that many of his closest colleagues
called him “Dr. Folkman.” And there was plenty of lionizing and
lamenting at the loss of such a valued colleague and mentor, as speakers
described Folkman’s enormous influence on their professional and, in
many cases, personal lives and on the lives of his patients.
But there was also something unorthodox about the proceedings, which is
what Folkman, an iconoclast, might have wanted. If there is one storyline
that has prevailed, not just in the public imagination but also in the minds
of scientists, it is how Folkman spent the better part of his career hatching
and then struggling to gain acceptance for his theory of tumor angiogenesis—that
for cancer cells to take root and grow they must put out a nourishing growth
of blood vessels.
With talks by former students and fellows covering a dizzying array of
Folkman-inspired topics—from hemangiomas and other vascular deformities to neurosurgery,
transplantation biology, drug delivery and design, chemotherapy dosing regimens,
parenteral nutrition–associated liver disease, biomarkers for cancer
and other diseases, and mechanical forces in biology—the overall effect
of the symposium was to splinter, if not shatter, that storyline.
Though angiogenesis—in cancer and other areas—was the centerpiece
of his work, and of the symposium, Folkman had time in his 100 plus–hour
workweek to come up with other innovative, occasionally outlandish, hypotheses,
many of which turned out to be correct. Observing that tumor cells phagocytose
dying cancer cells, he suggested that they were taking up the dead cells’ genes
to enhance their genomic instability and ability to progress. He and Lars
Holmgren would go on to show that tumor DNA could be taken up by host endothelial
cells and that the cells could cause explosive blood vessel growth when injected
into mice. “No one would really expect that except for one person,
Judah Folkman,” said Holmgren, professor of tumor biology at the Karolinska
Institute.
Folkman’s fundamental perception—that blood vessels do not merely
connect isolated organs and tissues but instead make up a dynamic, interactive,
pulsatile system, constantly shaping and reshaping themselves and the tissues
they feed, exerting chemical and physical forces—would lead to another
hypothesis: that cells, in particular cancer cells, live in a messy, high-pressure
world; they are stretched, pulled, and jostled and can be stimulated to grow
or die by these mechanical forces—a theory that would attract the young
Ingber.
“I didn’t come to work for Judah Folkman because of angiogenesis.
I never heard of angiogenesis,” said Ingber, the Judah Folkman professor
of vascular biology in the Department of Pathology at Children’s Hospital
Boston, who has spent the past 30 years exploring the effects of mechanical
force in many areas of biology.
|
“Dr. Folkman could make the big leap. He would then go back to design
hypotheses to test it. Those that were correct would launch many a career and
improve many lives.”
|
Remarkably, Folkman had his insight into angiogenesis at a time when endothelial
cells were barely known to most biologists. “When I began in the late
1960s as a medical student, the word endothelial didn’t exist as a
title in the card catalog at Countway,” said Michael Gimbrone, the
Ramzi S. Cotran professor of pathology at HMS and Brigham and Women’s
Hospital. There were no media for culturing endothelial cells. Gimbrone,
Folkman’s first postdoc, would collect discarded umbilical cords from
Brigham and Women’s Hospital and run them back to Folkman’s lab
in Enders Hall. Eventually, they hit on a method for growing the cells. “I
get a rush even now just thinking about it,” said Gimbrone.
The speakers recounted many goose bump moments. For Langer, Institute Professor
at MIT, one occurred when he and Folkman, after many attempts, developed
a polymer microsphere capable of delivering relatively bulky angiogenesis-inhibiting
molecules into the eyes of mice—a feat many believed impossible because
polymers were thought to distribute only very small molecules. “The
only problem Dr. Folkman and I had was we really didn’t know that,” said
Langer.
For Michael O’Reilly, associate professor of radiation oncology and
cancer biology at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, it
occurred when he isolated from 200 liters of extraordinarily pungent mouse
urine the angiogenesis inhibitor angiostatin and showed that it could stop
tumors from metastasizing, confirming Folkman’s hypothesis. For Moses,
HMS professor of surgery at Children’s, it was her demonstration that
human urine held matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), telltale cancer-related
molecules, a discovery inspired by Folkman’s long-held belief that
cancer would someday be detected before tumors were actually visible.
In a twist on the age-old narrative of early brilliance, some speakers
traced Folkman’s greatness as a scientist to his ability to retain
certain characteristics of a young child. Patricia Donahoe, the Marshall
K. Bartlett professor of surgery at Massachusetts General Hospital, recited
a poem she wrote that began, “A boy filled with wonder/Remains so as
a man.” Steven
Fishman said he once told a reporter that Folkman reminded him of his then
5-year-old child. “He would draw conclusions from observations unencumbered
by prior knowledge. He would spontaneously make bold statements with seemingly
no evidence,” said Fishman, HMS associate professor of surgery at Children’s. “Dr.
Folkman could make the big leap. He would then go back to design hypotheses
to test it. Those that were correct would launch many a career and improve
many lives.”
It is a central aspect of the Folkman legend that he sowed many seeds of
his own. In fact, Robert D’Amato compared him to Johnny Appleseed, “who
didn’t get credit for all the apples he planted around Ohio and that
people are still picking.” One of Folkman’s biggest groves was
the famous white board on the 12th floor of the Karp building, where he wrote
down all of the central questions in a given year. “People would come
look at the 12th floor board and say to him, ‘Don’t you worry
that people will steal your ideas?’” said D’Amato, HMS
associate professor of ophthalmology at Children’s. “He said, ‘I
hope they do.’”
—Misia Landau
top
|